That a woman would be inseminated with the sperm of a man who is not her husband, hoping to become pregnant, is a great evil and entirely impermissible. Those i

There is also a third case, which is a variation of the two: That is when the sperm of both husband and wife are collected and placed in a special tube to be mixed in a specific medical manner, and then this mixture is injected into the wife’s womb. This method is more dangerous than the first because of the possibility of contamination or mix-up with other samples at the clinic, or due to religious negligence or malpractice. This case was approved by the Council by majority vote, though some members disagreed or abstained. I personally abstained because of the high risks involved. In conclusion: Permissibility is limited strictly to procedures involving the husband and wife. If the sperm or egg is from someone other than the married couple, it is impermissible by consensus. The scholarly debate only concerns the two methods involving husband and wife—either direct injection of the husband's sperm, or combining both spouses' reproductive material in a tube before implantation—both of which require strict precaution. Host: May Allāh reward you. So, there are multiple scenarios, each with its own ruling. Sheikh: Correct. Only those two scenarios between the spouses were approved by the Council. Host: May Allāh bless you. Source: https://t.me/womensbenefits/837