โ† Back to Women's BenefitsView source post

๐—ช๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป'๐˜€ ๐—•๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜€ (274)

12 November 2024 โ€ข 3.45K views
Wedding Rings vs. Rings Worn as Adornments Question: What is the ruling on women wearing a ุฏูุจู’ู„ูŽุฉ (*): if the ring is worn solely as an adornment? Sheikh โ€™Abdulhameed Az-Zu'kari แธฅafidhahullฤh In essence, the ุฏุจู„ุฉ is actually a ring. If it is worn solely as an adornment, there is no harm in this. However, designating a ring specifically for engagement or marriageโ€”where only engaged or married women wear itโ€”and considering its presence on a woman's hand as a symbol of her commitment, or its removal as a symbol of the end of the relationship, is prohibited, as it imitates the practices of the disbelievers. _ (*) This refers to a specific type of ring, often associated with engagement or marriage. @womensbenefits