At best, Ihyaa At-Turaath have only replaced their former president (Abdurrahmaan AbdulKhaliq) with another individual (Tariq Al-Isaa) who is similar and very c

POINT 3: Co-operating with Ihyaa At-Turaath! Sheikh Rabee' waffaqahullah said: Co-operation with Ihyaa At-Turaath is co-operation against the Salafi Manhaj. [https://t.me/madrasatuna/2764] Sheikh Ahmad An-Najmi rahimahullah was asked: Is it permissible to seek knowledge from a person who does not see al-Arūr, Abul-Ḥasan and al-Maghrāwī as innovators, and he claims that Iḥyā al-Turāth are Salafī. He also has not sought knowledge nor does he have any recommendations from the scholars, rather he has only taken knowledge from books and tapes of Ibn Bāz, al-Albānī and al-ʿUthaymīn? He rahimahullah responded: In reality, he who does not hold those people to be innovators then he is included amongst them. This is because those people are people of innovation. As for al-Maghrāwī, then it has been established that he is a Takfīrī." [https://t.me/madrasatuna/2779] Note: This Fatwa is only applicable in the case of one who praises & defends these innovators while being aware of their condition. Sheikh Sulayman Ar Ruhayli said: I know Jam'iyyah Ihyaa' at-Turaath and I know all of its subsidiary branches. At any rate, I say in summary; after their views have been made clear there does not remain any excuse for anyone to remain with Ihyaa' at-Turaath, this is the synopsis. There remains no excuse. The condition of Ihyaa' at-Turaath has been completely clarified and it has been clarified they will not accept (advice in this manner) and it is possible to advise them from the outside. I am not saying do not advise Ihyaa' at-Turaath, but I am saying advise them from the outside, because the harm of remaining with them is greater than the benefit. [https://t.me/madrasatuna/2782]