deceptive; they come to the virtuous scholars with individuals from Ahlus-Sunnah who are trusted by them and they say: 'O Sheikh, Allah has brought about much g

* Note: The points of criticism on 'Abdurrahman 'AbdulKhaliq by Sheikh Ibn Baz rahimahullah are mentioned here: http://www.binbaz.org.sa/mat/8677 He was also criticised by Sheikh Fawzan [https://t.me/madrasatuna/2774] and Sheikh Uthaymeen [https://t.me/madrasatuna/2773]. Furthermore, Sheikh Baz rahimahullah said: “What's incumbent upon the Muslim scholars is to clarify the reality and to hold dialogues with every group/Jam'iyyah, and to advice everyone with treading upon the path which Allah has outlined for His servants; the path which our Prophet ﷺ invited to. Whoever transgresses this or persists in his stubbornness due to personal interests or for a purpose that only Allah knows, then it is obligatory upon those who know the truth to criticise and warn against him, in order for people to avoid their way and so that those who do not know their true reality do not enter with them such that they are misled and diverted by them from the straight path which Allah commanded us to follow.” [Majmoo' Fataawa wa maqaalaat mutanawwi'ah (5/202)] Sheikh Ahmad An-Najmi rahimahullah said: It is well known that Jam'iyyah Ihyaa At-Turaath is a Hizbi organisation. [https://alnajmi.net/portal/fatawas/fat5/] Sheikh Muqbil rahimahullah was asked: This man, along with Suhaib Hasan, claims that the Jam'iyyah Ihyaa At-Turaath affiliated with AbdurRahman AbdulKhaliq is a good Jam'iyyah which calls to the truth, relying on a fatwa from Sheikh Ibn Baz hafidhahullah, even though they know the travesty of this Jam'iyyah, as many sheikhs advised them and explained their cooperation with the Shiites, the Rafidites, the people of innovation and others. The question is: based on their claim that they are following the fatwa of sheikh ibn Baz hafidhahullah in what he said, what is the basis for clarifying this issue? He answered: As for Jam'iyyah Ihyaa At-Turaath, it should be called Jam'iyyah Imaatat At-Turaath (The destruction of Islamic heritage). What heritage have they revived? They receive millions from businessmen and they have only published thirty books or less (mostly works written by Abdurrahmaan Abdulkhaliq) and they spread that...So what heritage have they revived? Yes! After [knowing] this, you two miskeen, arrogant ones [praise them?] Ihyaa At-Turaath has now split into four groups. Allah the Almighty recompensed them for their evil deeds. They have split Ahlus-Sunnah. They split them in Yemen, Egypt, in the lands of the two Holy Sanctuaries (Makkah & Madina) and Najd, in Kuwait and Sudan, so much so the Sudanese brothers call the followers of AbduRahman AbdduKhaliq 'Maslahiyyeen', meaning the people of interests. Yes! And Allah the Almighty punished them; for indeed the recompense/punishment is proportionate to the crime. So He (the Almighty) placed rifts between them and so they split apart, as the Kuwaiti brothers who visited us in recent days informed me. They split into what?...into four groups. It is a fitting [recompense] that they have split up O brothers. A Jam'iyyah that enters the Taghooti elections, a Jam'iyyah that enters the Taghooti National Assembly, a Jam'iyyah that approves the Kuwaiti constitution; which states that, if a woman consents to Zina she is not liable to being punished, or something of this meaning. The point being, it (Ihyaa At-Turaath) was ruined by 'AbduRahman Ibn AbdulKhaliq and Abdullah As-Sabbat. That one is from Abu Dhabi/ Dubai, i.e. As-Sabt, and this one from Egypt...Now these two individuals are competing between themselves based on worldly affairs.