A MEMBER WRITES:

"There's lack of sincerity seen from the channel (Manhaj Benefits). Most, if not all is answered by own insight and understanding regarding this issue. Whenever there's something specific like Tahiri, it is being referred to general evidences. While we know specifics go before generalities. Lack of accepting the advice of the scholars and referring back to them. Delving into other and new topics than the original subject. Which shows inability to comply with the scholars." ANOTHER BROTHER جزاه الله خيرا RESPONDS (1): "Jazakallahu khairan, akhi. Lack of sincerity is a matter of the heart, and it’s very difficult to measure, as we ourselves don’t always know if we are sincere. How then, can we claim that a brother, who is benefiting the da’wah, is insincere? (Did you look into his heart to know his sincerity?) In the Shari'ah, we refer to general evidences first, unless there is something specific that removes it from its general application. As for not accepting the advice of scholars, when it’s based on evidence or opinion? there’s no issue if someone respectfully disagrees with the Mashaayikh, akhi fillah. Just to clarify, I don’t want the brothers to take this engagement as a defense of the current situation. I’m simply disagreeing with the way some of our brothers are navigating the advice, which may end up causing more division and hostility!" ____ (1) I am sharing this message to emphasise that not everyone in this group chat holds a negative attitude towards their brothers. I also want to take this opportunity to encourage more members in the chat group to speak out against falsehood and not to remain silent. ((من رأى منكم منكرا فليغيره...الحديث)) Falsehood such as ⤵️ https://t.me/almanhajussalafi/907 https://t.me/almanhajussalafi/913 https://t.me/almanhajussalafi/915 النصيحة لأصحاب هذه المقالات: تَحَلَّلُّوا مِنْها الْيَوْمَ قَبْلَ أَلَّا يكُونَ دِينَارٌ وَلَا دِرْهَمٌ.