← Back to Manhaj BenefitsView source post

Further look at Abdurrahman Hasan

14 January 2025 • 2.54K views
1⃣. Studied under Controversial Figures: A- Abu Ishaaq Al-Huwayni (https://t.me/almanhajussalafi/1460), yet AbdulRahman Hassan regards him as a "Sheikh hafidahullāh (may Allāh preserve him)". B- Salih Al-Maghamasi; Known for Sufi inclinations (t.me/Bashuaib/3895) 2⃣. Connections with Innovators and Hizbees: - Cooperates and lectures alongside individuals labelled as innovators, such as Abu Usaamah Adh-Dhahabi and Uthman Lateef. - Lectures in masjids affiliated with Hizbis, such as Greenlane masjid (Birmingham), masjid Tawheed (London), Masjid Al-Furqan (Manchester)... 3⃣. Problematic Statements on Jarh wa Ta'deel: - Makes general claims like "Jarh wa Ta'deel is Ijtihaadi" without proper explanation. - Advocates principles like "the speech of contemporaries is buried and not relayed", undermining the methodology of Jarh wa Ta'deel. - Dismisses detailed criticisms in favour of praise, which contradicts established principles of assessing narrators. 4⃣. Disrespectful Remarks: - Made inappropriate comments about Imam Shu'bah ibn Hajjaaj, presenting him disrespectfully during a lecture. 5⃣. Engagement with Deviants: - Participated in debates with major deviants, using flattering titles like "Shaykh" and expressing admiration, which reflects poorly on his stance against misguidance. 6⃣. Inclination Toward Tamyee': - Displays leniency and a lack of firmness in dealing with issues of deviation and misguidance, causing concern over his reliability as a source of knowledge. 7⃣. Teaching women without a screen ⤵️ https://t.me/almanhajussalafi/1192 https://t.me/womensbenefits/228 CONCLUSION: Abdurrahman Hassan's connections, statements, and actions raise significant doubts about his adherence to sound methodology in matters of knowledge and refutation. It is recommended to exercise caution and avoid taking knowledge from him.